<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/
         http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-04T09:25:30Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dcpapers.dublincore.org:952521173" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://dcpapers.dublincore.org/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:dcpapers.dublincore.org:952521173</identifier>
        <datestamp>2025-12-24</datestamp>
        <setSpec>dcmi-2025</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
    <oai_dc:dc
        xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
        xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
        xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/
        http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
      <dc:title>Evaluating Publisher-Generated Metadata Quality in Spanish Law Journals: A Comparative Study Using Crossref, OpenAlex and Dialnet</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Borrego, Ángel</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Urbano, Cristóbal</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Crossref</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Dialnet</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>legal publishing</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>publisher-generated metadata</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>metadata quality</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>OpenAlex</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>scholarly communication</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Spanish law journals</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>This ongoing project aims to evaluate the quality and completeness of publisher-generated metadata in Spanish law journals by comparing records from Crossref and OpenAlex with those curated by Dialnet, a major Spanish bibliographic platform. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyze metadata elements such as authorship, abstracts, references and ORCID identifiers across a corpus of journals. The expected findings may help identify inconsistencies and gaps, particularly in metadata standardization and completeness, which hinder the discoverability and interoperability of legal scholarship.</dc:description>
      <dc:publisher>Dublin Core Metadata Initiative</dc:publisher>
      <dc:date>2025-12-24</dc:date>
      <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
      <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
      <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
      <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.23106/dcmi.952521173</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://dcpapers.dublincore.org/article/952521173</dc:identifier>
      <dc:source>Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Conference Proceedings</dc:source>
      <dc:language>en</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
    </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>