<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/
         http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-09T10:14:11Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dcpapers.dublincore.org:952135721" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://dcpapers.dublincore.org/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:dcpapers.dublincore.org:952135721</identifier>
        <datestamp>2011-09-21</datestamp>
        <setSpec>dc-2011</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
    <oai_dc:dc
        xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
        xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
        xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/
        http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
      <dc:title>Free-Text Collection-Level Subject Metadata in Large-Scale Digital Libraries: A Comparative Content Analysis</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Zavalina, Oksana L.</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>digital libraries</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>digital aggregations</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>digital collections</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>collection-level metadata</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>subject metadata</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>free-text metadata</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>metadata evaluation</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>metadata quality</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>content analysis</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>Metadata is central for information organization in digital libraries. A growing number of digital libraries worldwide are now generating metadata to describe not only individual objects but entire digital collections as integral wholes. However, collection-level metadata has not yet been empirically evaluated. This paper reports results of the study that used an in-depth comparative content analysis to assess free-text collection-level subject metadata in three large-scale digital cultural heritage aggregations in the United States and Europe. As observed by this study, the emerging best practices include encoding a variety of information about a digital collection in free-text collection-level Description metadata element. This includes both subject-specific (topical, geographic and temporal coverage, and types/genres of objects in a digital collection) and non-subject-specific information: title, size, provenance, collection development, copyright, audience, navigation and functionality, language of items in a digital collection, frequency of additions, institutions that host a digital collection or contribute to it, funding sources, item creators, importance, uniqueness, and comprehensiveness of a digital collection.</dc:description>
      <dc:publisher>Dublin Core Metadata Initiative</dc:publisher>
      <dc:date>2011-09-21</dc:date>
      <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
      <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
      <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
      <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.23106/dcmi.952135721</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://dcpapers.dublincore.org/article/952135721</dc:identifier>
      <dc:source>Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Conference Proceedings</dc:source>
      <dc:language>en</dc:language>
      <dc:relation>https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q68240631</dc:relation>
      <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
    </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>