<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/
         http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-08-09T08:37:19Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dcpapers.dublincore.org:952109449" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://dcpapers.dublincore.org/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:dcpapers.dublincore.org:952109449</identifier>
        <datestamp>2008-09-10</datestamp>
        <setSpec>dc-2008</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
    <oai_dc:dc
        xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
        xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
        xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/
        http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
      <dc:title>Applying DC to Institutional Data Repositories</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Rice, Robin C</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>data curation</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>datasets</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>DDI</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>DSpace</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>institutional repositories</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Dublin Core</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>DISC-UK DataShare is a JISC-funded collaborative project led by
                EDINA, with the London School of Economics and the Universities of Edinburgh,
                Oxford, and Southampton. This poster will look at how each partner is developing
                exemplars for the deposit of research datasets in open access institutional
                repositories (IRs). Datasets are not different from other digital materials in that
                they need to be described, not just for discovery but also for preservation and
                re-use. The GRADE project found that Dublin Core descriptive metadata was sufficient
                for discovery within a DSpace repository, though more in-depth metadata or
                documentation was required for re-use after downloading. In the absence of a Dublin
                Core application profile for research data, the project partners have looked at the
                other metadata models, such as DDI and STFC. The poster will also cover
                self-archiving versus assisted deposit of datasets, policies and licenses, and the
                need to establish relationships with researchers at key points in the data life
                cycle to build trust and user-centred curation services.</dc:description>
      <dc:publisher>Dublin Core Metadata Initiative</dc:publisher>
      <dc:date>2008-09-10</dc:date>
      <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
      <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
      <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
      <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.23106/dcmi.952109449</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://dcpapers.dublincore.org/article/952109449</dc:identifier>
      <dc:source>Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Conference Proceedings</dc:source>
      <dc:language>en</dc:language>
      <dc:relation>https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q120636564</dc:relation>
      <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
    </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>